Numerical Analysis for Integral and Related Operator Equations: OT  52 (Operator Theory: Advances and Applications): Siegfried Proessdorf  and Bernd Silbermann Birkhauser | ISBN: 3764326204 | 1991-11-01 | djvu (ocr) | 542 pages |  4.78 Mb 
 About 15 years ago, when we were writing our booklet "Projection Methods  and the Approximate Solution of Singular Equations" (1977) (that was  the time when German native speakers still wrote in German, and so this  little book is also in German), we were a long way from expecting that  the numerical analysis of several classes of integral equations was on  the point of entering a rapid stage of development, continuing until the  present time and being certain to endure for a long time to come. This  line of development was given decisive impetus by the increasing use of  boundary element methods (BEM's, sometimes also referred to as boundary  integral equation methods) in engineering and the natural sciences.
The essence of the methods alluded to may be described as follows. The  solution to the boundary value problem under consideration is sought as  an appropriately chosen integral over the boundary containing one or  more unknown functions as well as a known fundamental solution of the  differential equation to be solved. Inserting this ansatz (well known  from potential theory for more than 100 years) into the boundary  conditions leads to a boundary integral equation for the unknown  function. The solution of the latter integral equation then provides the  solution of the original boundary value problem in the form of an  integral representation. The wide number of possible choices of boundary  elements (e.g. of finite elements on the boundary as trial functions)  and of discretizations of the boundary integral equations (e.g.  collocation, Galerkin or quadrature methods) result in a whole variety  of BEM's. Comparing BEM's with finite difference and finite element  methods and considering the pros and cons, one will observe that BEM's  take a series of advantages from the facts that they allow a reduction  in the dimension of the problem by one unit and that they work equally  well for both interior and exterior boundary value problems. Therefore,  during the last decade BEM's have become a rather powerful and popular  technique in engineering computations of boundary value problems arising  from different fields of application. Notwithstanding the more than one  hundred year usage of boundary integral equation methods in the  analytical theory of boundary value problems, going back to C. Neumann's  pioneering work in 1877, the mathematically rigorous foundation and  error analysis of BEM's has been started on and (at least for  two-dimensional problems) has made fairly satisfactory progress  recently. The reason for this delay lies, in the author's view, in the  fact that boundary integral operators are in general neither integral  operators of the form identity plus compact operator nor of the form  identity plus an operator with small norm, so that the existing standard  theories for the numerical analysis of second kind Fredholm integral  equations cannot be applied. Boundary reduction rather leads to singular  integral equations, convolution equations (of Wiener-Hopf or Mellin  type), or even to pseudodifferential equations. For instance, solving  the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation in a domain with corners  by a double layer potential ansatz amounts to a convolution equation of  Mellin type of the form 5.0A) with the kernel 5.0C).
The study of the equations we encounter when applying BEM's requires  having recourse to a series of heavy guns from mathematical analysis. So  it is not surprising that this peculiarity is shared by the numerical  analysis of these equations. In our opinion, the profound investigation  of a broad variety of approximation methods for solving such integral  equations is a presentday problem of numerical analysis. Due to the  breadth and complexity of the questions touched upon above, it is  impossible to coverall aspects of the matter by a single monograph. We  therefore restrict our attention to the illumination of a few up-to-date  methods and ideas, which, as we reckon, form an indispensable part of  the numerical analysis of operator equations at present as well as in  future. On the other hand, we are fully aware that the present book is  nothing but a snapshot of what is going on and that its tone is set,  moreover, by our own scientific interests.
The book is addressed to a wide audience of readers. We hope that both  the mathematician interested in theoretical aspects of numerical  analysis and the engineer wishing to see practically realizable recipes  for computations will find a few suggestions. We tried to present the  material in a form which allows any reader to go to the chapters or  parts of the book he is interested in as quickly as possible. The  interdependence table provides an overall view of the connection between  the parts of this monograph.